Fekry Aiad
← Back to Blog

The Myth of Linearity in Learning Design

March 23, 2024·4 min read
The Myth of Linearity in Learning Design

We are taught to think of skill acquisition as a ladder. You start at the bottom, climb each rung sequentially, and eventually reach the top.

This model is wrong.

The process of learning design — real design, the kind that ships and breathes and fails publicly — is nothing like a ladder. It's more like a series of stepping stones arranged in fog. You can see maybe two or three ahead of you. You take a step. The fog shifts. New stones appear.

Why Linear Models Fail Designers

The ladder model creates a particular kind of anxiety: the fear that you've skipped a rung. That there's foundational knowledge you're missing, and that your entire structure is therefore unstable.

This anxiety is almost never productive, and it's often paralyzing.

I've worked with designers who spent six months consuming courses about typography before feeling "ready" to touch a real project. The irony is that six weeks of shipping bad typography and learning from the feedback would have taught them more than six months of passive consumption.

Linear models also misrepresent what expertise actually looks like. Senior designers aren't people who've completed the curriculum. They're people who've encountered enough edge cases that they've built a map of the territory — including all the places where the rules break down.

Learning Through Failure

The best design education I've ever had was shipping something that completely failed.

Not failed privately, in a Figma file that no one saw. Failed in front of users. Failed in a way that generated data. Failed in a way that forced me to build a new mental model.

There's no curriculum for this. You can't study your way into it.

The Stepping Stones Model

Here's what I've found actually describes how designers learn:

You work on something at the edge of your current ability. It's uncomfortable and you make mistakes. You ship it anyway. You get feedback — from users, from collaborators, from your own discomfort looking at it six months later.

You take a step you didn't plan to take. The fog shifts. You can see the next two stones.

The path wasn't linear. It was responsive. And the territory it covered was shaped entirely by the specific problems you chose to engage with.


Choose harder problems. Ship faster. The fog moves.

More Posts

Fekry Aiad